Periodontology

«Parodontologiya» (Periodontology) - peer-reviewed quarterly scientific-practical journal for dentists. Founded in 1996 in St. Petersburg, Russia. Since 2001, released by publishing house «Poly Media Press».
Founders: Therapeutic dentistry department of Saint-Petersburg State Medical University named after acad. I.P. Pavlov, St. Petersburg periodontologic center «PAKS».
In the journal publishes articles of practitioners and researchers, drawn from the materials of original research and clinical observations, as well as thematic reviews of the literature. The journal also publishes brief reports on interesting clinical cases in periodontics.

ISSN 1683-3759
Journal «Parodontologiya» is included in the list of leading and recommended for scientific publication journals of Higher Certifying Commission of Russia (VAС).
Journal «Parodontologiya» is included in the Russian Index of Science Citation (RINC).

Founders:

City center for periodontology "PAKS", St.Petersburg

Department of Therapeutic Dentistry of First St. Petersburg State Medical University named Acad. I.P.Pavlov.

Editorial Board

Chief Editor:

Orekhova L.J.,Doctor of Medicine, Professor, Head of the Department of Dentistry of Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University

Orekhova Ludmila Jurjevna ,Doctor of Medicine, Professor, Head of the Department of Dentistry of  Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University

Senior specialist of St. Petersburg and Russian Federation in periodontics, immunology, organization of dental care, training of medical personnel in the undergraduate and postgraduate periods.

Materials of many research papers of professor Orekhova became a part of normative documents of Ministry of  Healthcare of  Russian Federation. She has published more than 500 scientific works, including 16 monographs, 4 textbooks (including "Therapeutic dentistry", "Dentistry"), 8 manuals, and a chapter in the National guide "Therapeutic dentistry". Professor Orekhova has 2 copyright certificates, 7 patents for inventions, 1 discovery.

Professor Orekhova is a doctor of a superior  category, operating periodontist, has prepared a lot of doctors for the practical healthcare of St. Petersburg and Russia. She is the one of the few specialists who can actively use the skill of laser technologies in dentistry for more than 10 years.

Professor Orekhova is a member of the Board of the scientific society of dentists of St. Petersburg and Leningrad region;

President of the Russian Periodontological Association

Vice-President of Dental Association of St. Petersburg and Leningrad region;

Full member of the Academy of esthetic and cosmetic dentistry (Moscow);

Fcademician of Peter's Academy of Frts and Sciences;

Fcademician of the International Academy of Posara Pierre (France);

Member of the academic and dissertation councils of Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University;

Founder and a chief of the scientific and practical journal "Periodontology»;

Member of the editorial board of the journal "Endodontology Today»

Vice-President of the section of Periodontics of the Dental Association of Russia

General Director of the municipal periodontal center PAKS (St. Petersburg).

Professor Orekhova Is the author of twenty-six guidelines for students and for practicing doctor in the most important subject of therapeutic dentistry. She is an  organizer of a lot of congresses, scientific and practical conferences, of ongoing training seminars for clinicians in all major subjects of therapeutic dentistry.

Under the scientific guidance of L. Orekhova defended 2 doctoral and 28 PhD theses.

In 2009 professor Orekhova was awarded the Order of merit for dentistry, in 2010 – Medal of the Order of merit for the Fatherland of II degree.

Information materials publication - 100 Euro per each 1000 symbols.

Contact Us

Publishing Ethics

 1. Introduction

1.1. The publication in a peer reviewed learned journal, serves many purposes outside of simple communication. It is a building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. For all these reasons and more it is important to lay down standards of expected ethical behaviour by all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society for society-owned or sponsored journal: " Periodontology"

1.2.Publisher has a supporting, investing and nurturing role in the scholarly communication process but is also ultimately responsible for ensuring that best practice is followed in its publications.

1.3.Publisher takes its duties of guardianship over the scholarly record extremely seriously. Our journal programmes record «the minutes of science» and we recognise our responsibilities as the keeper of those «minutes» in all our policies not least the ethical guidelines that we have here adopted.

2. Duties of Editors

2.1.Publication decision – The Editor of a learned " Periodontology" is solely and independently responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published, often working on conjunction with the relevant society (for society-owned or sponsored journals). The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always underwrite such decisions. The Editor may be guided by the policies of the " Periodontology" journal’s editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers (or society officers) in making this decision.

2.2.Fair play – An editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

2.3.Confidentiality – The editor and any editorial staff of " Periodontology" must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

2.4.Disclosure and Conflicts of interest

2.4.1. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.

2.4.2. Editors should recuse themselves (i.e. should ask a co-editor, associate editor or other member of the editorial board instead to review and consider) from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers.

2.5.Vigilance over published record – An editor presented with convincing evidence that the substance or conclusions of a published paper are erroneous should coordinate with the publisher (and/or society) to promote the prompt publication of a correction, retraction, expression of concern, or other note, as may be relevant.

2.6.Involvement and cooperation in investigations – An editor should take reasonably responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper, in conjunction with the publisher (or society). Such measures will generally include contacting the author of the manuscript or paper and giving due consideration of the respective complaint or claims made, but may also include further communications to the relevant institutions and research bodies.

3.    Duties of Reviewers

3.1.Contribution to Editorial Decisions – Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. Peer review is an essential component of formal scholarly communication, and lies at the heart of the scientific method. Publisher  shares the view of many that all scholars who wish to contribute to publications have an obligation to do a fair share of reviewing.

3.2.Promptness – Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor of " Periodontology" and excuse himself from the review process.

3.3.Confidentiality – Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorised by the editor.

3.4.Standard and objectivity – Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

3.5.Acknowledgement of Sources – Reviewers  should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

3.6.Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

3.6.1. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.

3.6.2. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

4. Duties of Authors

4.1.Reporting standards

4.1.1. Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

4.1.2. Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial 'opinion’ works should be clearly identified as such.

4.2.Data Access and Retention – Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

4.3.Originality and Plagiarism

4.3.1. The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

4.3.2. Plagiarism takes many forms, from ‘passing off’ another’s paper as the author’s own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another’s paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

4.4.Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

4.4.1. An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal of primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

4.4.2. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.

4.4.3. Publication of some kinds of articles (eg, clinical guidelines, translations) in more than one journal is sometimes justifiable, provided certain conditions are met. The authors and editors of the journals concerned must agree to the secondary publication, which must reflect the same data and interpretation of the primary document. The primary reference must be cited in the secondary publication. Further detail on acceptable forms of secondary publication can be found at www.icmje.org.

4.5.Acknowledgement of Sources – Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.

4.6.Authorship of the Paper

4.6.1. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

4.6.2. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

4.7.Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

4.7.1. If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

4.7.2. If the work involves the use of animal or human subjects, the author should ensure that the manuscript contains a statement that all procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) have approved them. Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.

4.8. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

4.8.1. All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

4.8.2. Examples of potential conflicts of interest which should be disclosed include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest possible stage.

4.9. Fundamental errors in published works – When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in a published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the editor or publisher of " Periodontology" journal and cooperate with Publisher to retract or correct the paper, If the editor or the publisher learn from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the paper.

5. Duties of the Publisher (and if relevant, Society)

5.1. Publisher  should adopt policies and procedures that support editors, reviewers and authors of " Periodontology" in performing their ethical duties under these ethics guidelines. The publisher should ensure that the potential for advertising or reprint revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.

5.2. Publisher should support " Periodontology" editors in the review of complaints raised concerning ethical issues and help communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful to editors.

5.3. Publisher should develop codes of practice and inculcate industry standards for best practice on ethical matters, errors and retractions.

5.4. Publisher  should provide specialised legal review and counsel if necessary.

The section is prepared according to the files (http://health.elsevier.ru/attachments/editor/file/ethical_code_final.pdf) of Elsevier publisher (https://www.elsevier.com/) and files (http://publicationethics.org/resources) from Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE - http://publicationethics.org/). 

 Our publishing house is grateful to the reviewers for their work:

Gerasimova L. P. - M.D., Professor, Head of the Department of  therapeutic dentistry of Bashkir State Medical University

Kabirova M. F. - M.D. Associate Professor, Head of Department, Dean of the faculty of dentistry of Bashkir State Medical University

Borodulina I. I. - M.D. Associate Professor, Professor at the Department of Maxillofacial surgery and dental surgery of S. M. Kirov Military medical Academy

Shehter A. B. - M.D., Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Experimental pathology of I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University 

Bulkina N. V. - M.D., Professor, Head of the Department of  therapeutic dentistry of Saratov State Medical University

Mandra J.V. - M.D., Professor, Vice-rector for research and innovation of Ural State Medical University

Author fees

Publication in " Periodontology" is free of charge for all the authors.

The journal doesn't have any Arcticle processing charges.

The journal doesn't have any Article submission charges.

 Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.

Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

 Plagiarism detection

"Periodontology" use native russian-language plagiarism detection software Antiplagiat to screen the submissions. If plagiarism is identified, the COPE guidelines on plagiarism will be followed.

 Preprint and postprint Policy

Prior to acceptance and publication in "Periodontology", authors may make their submissions available as preprints on personal or public websites.

As part of submission process, authors are required to confirm that the submission has not been previously published, nor has been submitted. After a manuscript has been published in "Periodontology" we suggest that the link to the article on journal's website is used when the article is shared on personal or public websites.

Glossary (by SHERPA)

Preprint - In the context of Open Access, a preprint is a draft of an academic article or other publication before it has been submitted for peer-review or other quality assurance procedure as part of the publication process. Preprints cover initial and successive drafts of articles, working papers or draft conference papers.

Postprint - The final version of an academic article or other publication - after it has been peer-reviewed and revised into its final form by the author. As a general term this covers both the author's final version and the version as published, with formatting and copy-editing changes in place.

© 2000-2013 «Поли Медиа Пресс»

Варшавское шоссе, дом 46, офис 334

Телефон: (495) 781-28-30

Мы в соцсетях: